| 000 | 01158nam a2200253Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 65351 | ||
| 003 | PER1691 | ||
| 005 | 20251009085807.0 | ||
| 008 | 170707n r p 0 0eng d | ||
| 041 | _aengtag | ||
| 050 | _aHM101 B859 2014 | ||
| 082 | _a. | ||
| 100 | _aTracy Llanera | ||
| 245 | 0 | _aMorality by Words: Murdoch, Nussbaum, Rorty. | |
| 264 |
_aQuezon City: _bAteneo De Manila University, _cc2014 |
||
| 336 |
_btext _atext _2text |
||
| 337 |
_bunmediated _aunmediated _2unmediated |
||
| 338 |
_bvolume _avolume _2volume |
||
| 385 | _a2 | ||
| 505 | _aABSTRACT Despite the initial strangeness of grouping Iris Murdoch (a Platonist), MarthaNussbaum (an Aristotelian), and Richard Rorty (a pragmatist) together, thispaper will argue that these thinkers share a strong commitment to the moralpurport of literature. I will also show that their shared idea of moralengagement through literature interlocks the individual's sense of self and theworld of others. After considering their accounts, I will conclude by raising thequestion of literature's moral limits. | ||
| 526 | _aF | ||
| 655 | _aphilosophy and humanities | ||
| 942 |
_alcc _cSL _2lcc |
||
| 999 |
_c6898 _d6898 |
||